Lodu:Tokio
Sen šingotez om Vikipedijan vepsänkel'žen versijan radon znamasine čuraduz. |
Sen šingotez om Vikipedijan vepsänkel'žen versijan radon znamasine čuraduz. |
Om lujas hüvä, miše meil nügüd' om se pit'k kirjutuz! --Максим (arutelu) 3. heinku 2014, kell 13:20 (MSK)
Нüvä kirjutuz?
[vajehtada lähtetekst]Should this be a Нüvä kirjutuz? K9re11 (arutelu) 11. eloku 2015, kell 18:53 (MSK)
No, I thought not. That's why: Tokio-kirjutuz is a short but complete translation of Russian article one (often we haven't enough time to read, to find, and short but complete articles is ecological niche for this wiki); a little of references; too many future articles (in red); it is strange to made Tokio Hüväks kirjutuseks, while Vepsian kulture in Vepsian Wikipedia has too little articles. There are same problems in articles as Järgeline pölvaz, Suksed, but they have a part of Vepsian language and even kulture somewhere. -- Koiravva (arutelu) 12. eloku 2015, kell 00:18 (MSK)